bader added a comment. @aaron.ballman, thank you for fixing the problem with documentation generation.
With regards to attributes naming question, let me check if I get it right. 1. You suggest checking with Khronos if they want to adopt `[[opencl::private]]` attribute names in OpenCL kernel language standard. Right? @Anastasia, can you help with this? 2. If Khronos leaves this decision to implementers, are current names (e.g. `[[clang::opencl_private]]`) look okay or we should consider other options? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71005/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71005 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
