NoQ added a comment.

In D69962#1739440 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69962#1739440>, @NoQ wrote:

> In D69962#1738618 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69962#1738618>, @Szelethus wrote:
>
> > Nice catch! Though, wouldn't the memory sanitizer buildbots break on this 
> > reliably?
>
>
> I kinda hope so; i'll take a look at home.


Memory sanitizer at home: //*fails with 1700 uninitialized reads in TableGen*//.

I guess i could commit test first, then get buildbots to fail, then if they do 
commit the code, otherwise commit the code and multiply the run-lines.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69962/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69962



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to