Ericson2314 added a comment. While I am fine making `-fuse-ld=lld` mean "use that lld driver most appropriate for the clang driver", in principle the clang driver and lld driver choices are orthogonal, and I'd want to expose that with something like `-fuse-ld=ld.lld` to compliment `-fuse-ld=lld-link`. How does that sound? Should we support `-fuse-ld=ld.bfd` and `-fuse-ld=ld64.lld` too?
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
