Author: marshall Date: Tue Feb 16 10:05:15 2016 New Revision: 260975 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260975&view=rev Log: Add some status
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=260975&r1=260974&r2=260975&view=diff ============================================================================== --- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original) +++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Tue Feb 16 10:05:15 2016 @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2572">2572</a></td><td>The remarks for <tt>shared_ptr::operator*</tt> should apply to <i>cv</i>-qualified <tt>void</tt> as well</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2574">2574</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] <tt>std::experimental::function::operator=(F&&)</tt> should be constrained</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2575">2575</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] <tt>experimental::function::assign</tt> should be removed</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> - <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2576">2576</a></td><td><tt>istream_iterator</tt> and <tt>ostream_iterator</tt> should use <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> + <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2576">2576</a></td><td><tt>istream_iterator</tt> and <tt>ostream_iterator</tt> should use <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Patch done; needs tests</td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2577">2577</a></td><td><tt>{shared,unique}_lock</tt> should use <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> - <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2579">2579</a></td><td>Inconsistency wrt Allocators in <tt>basic_string</tt> assignment vs. <tt>basic_string::assign</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> + <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2579">2579</a></td><td>Inconsistency wrt Allocators in <tt>basic_string</tt> assignment vs. <tt>basic_string::assign</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2581">2581</a></td><td>Specialization of <tt><type_traits></tt> variable templates should be prohibited</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2582">2582</a></td><td>§[res.on.functions]/2's prohibition against incomplete types shouldn't apply to type traits</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2583">2583</a></td><td>There is no way to supply an allocator for <tt>basic_string(str, pos)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr> @@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ <li>2572 - </li> <li>2574 - </li> <li>2575 - I don't think we ever implemented this; so 'removing' it is trivial</li> -<li>2576 - This one is simple</li> +<li>2576 - This one is simple, but testing it will be hard. I tried making a sublass of istringstream, but it got sliced.</li> <li>2577 - This one is simple</li> -<li>2579 - This one is simple</li> +<li>2579 - Done.</li> <li>2581 - </li> <li>2582 - </li> <li>2583 - This looks easy.</li> _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits