Author: marshall
Date: Tue Feb 16 10:05:15 2016
New Revision: 260975
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260975&view=rev
Log:
Add some status
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=260975&r1=260974&r2=260975&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Tue Feb 16 10:05:15 2016
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2572">2572</a></td><td>The
remarks for <tt>shared_ptr::operator*</tt> should apply to <i>cv</i>-qualified
<tt>void</tt> as well</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2574">2574</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
<tt>std::experimental::function::operator=(F&&)</tt> should be
constrained</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2575">2575</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
<tt>experimental::function::assign</tt> should be
removed</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2576">2576</a></td><td><tt>istream_iterator</tt>
and <tt>ostream_iterator</tt> should use
<tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2576">2576</a></td><td><tt>istream_iterator</tt>
and <tt>ostream_iterator</tt> should use
<tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Patch done; needs
tests</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2577">2577</a></td><td><tt>{shared,unique}_lock</tt>
should use <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2579">2579</a></td><td>Inconsistency
wrt Allocators in <tt>basic_string</tt> assignment vs.
<tt>basic_string::assign</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2579">2579</a></td><td>Inconsistency
wrt Allocators in <tt>basic_string</tt> assignment vs.
<tt>basic_string::assign</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch
Ready</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2581">2581</a></td><td>Specialization
of <tt><type_traits></tt> variable templates should be
prohibited</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2582">2582</a></td><td>§[res.on.functions]/2's
prohibition against incomplete types shouldn't apply to type
traits</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2583">2583</a></td><td>There
is no way to supply an allocator for <tt>basic_string(str,
pos)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@
<li>2572 - </li>
<li>2574 - </li>
<li>2575 - I don't think we ever implemented this; so 'removing' it is
trivial</li>
-<li>2576 - This one is simple</li>
+<li>2576 - This one is simple, but testing it will be hard. I tried making a
sublass of istringstream, but it got sliced.</li>
<li>2577 - This one is simple</li>
-<li>2579 - This one is simple</li>
+<li>2579 - Done.</li>
<li>2581 - </li>
<li>2582 - </li>
<li>2583 - This looks easy.</li>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits