Author: marshall
Date: Tue Feb 16 08:42:23 2016
New Revision: 260966
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260966&view=rev
Log:
Add some comments
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=260966&r1=260965&r2=260966&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Tue Feb 16 08:42:23 2016
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2537";>2537</a></td><td>Constructors
for <code>priority_queue</code> taking allocators should call
<code>make_heap</code></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2539";>2539</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
<tt>invocation_trait</tt> definition definition doesn't work for surrogate
call functions</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2545";>2545</a></td><td>Simplify
wording for <tt>bind</tt> without explicitly specified return
type</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2557";>2557</a></td><td>Logical
operator traits are broken in the zero-argument
case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2558";>2558</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
Logical operator traits are broken in the zero-argument
case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2557";>2557</a></td><td>Logical
operator traits are broken in the zero-argument
case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2558";>2558</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
Logical operator traits are broken in the zero-argument
case</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2559";>2559</a></td><td>Error
in LWG 2234's resolution</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2560";>2560</a></td><td><tt>is_constructible</tt>
underspecified when applied to a function
type</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2565";>2565</a></td><td><tt>std::function</tt>'s
move constructor should guarantee nothrow for <tt>reference_wrapper</tt>s and
function pointers</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
<li>2192 - </li>
-<li>2253 - </li>
-<li>2255 - </li>
+<li>2253 - Arrays.ts is moribund. No action needed.</li>
+<li>2255 - Arrays.ts is moribund. No action needed.</li>
<li>2276 - </li>
<li>2450 - </li>
<li>2520 - </li>
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@
<li>2537 - </li>
<li>2539 - </li>
<li>2545 - </li>
-<li>2557 - </li>
-<li>2558 - </li>
+<li>2557 - Cleaning up wording; no code change required.</li>
+<li>2558 - Cleaning up wording; no code change required.</li>
<li>2559 - </li>
<li>2560 - </li>
<li>2565 - </li>
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@
<li>2575 - I don't think we ever implemented this; so 'removing' it is
trivial</li>
<li>2576 - This one is simple</li>
<li>2577 - This one is simple</li>
-<li>2579 - </li>
+<li>2579 - This one is simple</li>
<li>2581 - </li>
<li>2582 - </li>
-<li>2583 - </li>
-<li>2585 - </li>
+<li>2583 - This looks easy.</li>
+<li>2585 - This looks easy.</li>
<li>2586 - </li>
<li>2590 - </li>
</ul>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
