Quuxplusone added a comment. In D65043#1669410 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65043#1669410>, @sammccall wrote:
> (For actual coroutine support, treating `co_return` and `co_yield` like > `return` everywhere might make sense) I agree, with one nit. `co_return` should be treated like `return`, but `co_yield` and `co_await` should both be treated like `throw` (because they can be subexpressions). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65043/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65043 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
