sammccall added a comment.

Not sure if this patch is still live?

I implemented the suggestion from the last round in D67541 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D67541>.
I didn't add the coroutine tests, as clang-format doesn't seem to get any 
coroutine cases right in 20 mode that it missed in 17 mode. Instead I found a 
case that differed using `char8_t` and macros.

(For actual coroutine support, treating `co_return` and `co_yield` like 
`return` everywhere might make sense)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D65043/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D65043



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to