NoQ added a comment. In D66042#1627777 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042#1627777>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Yup. We will be able to present the drastic improvement made on LLVM > analyses, while giving us some breathing room to polish a long-term solution. > I suspect `-analyzer-config silence-checkers=core -analyzer-config > silence-checkers=something.Else` wont work (I believe the last value will be > used in the invocation), but if only scan-build is using it, we can do > `-analyzer-config silence-checkers=core,something.Else`. Note that scan-build exposes `-analyzer-config` as, well, `-analyzer-config`. So if we turn this into a config, changes in scan-build become relatively unnecessary. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
