Charusso added a comment. In D66042#1626122 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042#1626122>, @NoQ wrote:
> > use it locally > > What do you mean here? If you want to use the patch for evaluating your > results, you might as well untick the checker in the scan-build's index.html > interface. The point of having this patch landed is to allow users who are > worried by false positives of specific core checkers to use the Static > Analyzer on their code anyway, without being overwhelmed with false > positives. It was never about us, it was always about them^^ Well, it is not that difficult to write up a documentation: apply that patch so LLVM reports will be more awesome and we have not got enough time to make this large-scale tough change upstreamed: 1 // See whether we need to silence the checker. 2 StringRef ErrorTag = ErrorNode->getLocation().getTag()->getTagDescription(); 3 for (const std::string &CheckerName : Opts.CheckerSilenceVector) 4 if (ErrorTag.startswith(CheckerName)) 5 return nullptr; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
