kkwli0 added a comment.
In D65835#1622042 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835#1622042>, @ABataev wrote:
> > I want to be sure we're on the same page: For OpenMP 5.0, should we allow
> > is_device_ptr with the private clauses?
>
> Yes, since it is allowed by the standard.
Umm ... I probably missed some earlier discussions! What would be the behavior
of the following code?
p = omp_target_alloc(...);
#pragma omp target private(p) is_device_ptr(p)
p[...] = ...; // crash or not?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
