jdenny added a comment. In D65835#1621202 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835#1621202>, @ABataev wrote:
> >> See 2.19.7 Data-Mapping Attribute Rules, Clauses, and Directives > > > > I looked again. I'm still not finding any text in that section that > > implies is_device_ptr follows the same restrictions as map. Can you please > > cite specific lines of text instead of an entire section? Thanks for your > > help. > > Ah, it is only in OpenMP 5.0 anŠ² restrictions for the map clause are for map > clause only. Then we should allow `is_device_ptr` with the private clauses > for OpenMP 4.5. I want to be sure we're on the same page: For OpenMP 5.0, should we allow `is_device_ptr` with the private clauses? > Better to do this in a separate patch only for `is_device_ptr`. I'll remove it from this one. Thanks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
