gribozavr added a comment. > This suggestion would result another strange behavior: if the user disables > cert-err09-cpp because he or she doesn't want to see its reports, the other > one (cert-err61-cpp) will still report the issue. So he or she has to disable > both (or as many aliases it has).
That seems to be the case regardless of the implementation strategy in this patch. > This could be another advantage of this patch, since it would be annoying to > see a message in which a GCC-style checker warns about an LLVM-style > violation. I don't understand the scenario. I think people wouldn't enable both checkers in the first place. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65065/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65065 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
