hokein added a comment. In D65387#1604737 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65387#1604737>, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Could you add a bit more context to the description of the change: why do we > need the callback and what is the problem with what we have now? > I'm sure this was discussed offline and the change is justified, just wanted > to make sure we write it down in the change history. sorry for missing the context here (updated the description). Yeah, this was a prerequisite of implementing a generic mechanism for chainable refactorings based on the offline discussion. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65387/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65387 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
