andrew.w.kaylor added a comment. In D64067#1568895 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64067#1568895>, @hfinkel wrote:
> One thing to realize about these flags is that they're ABI-altering flags. If > the user provides the flag to alter the platform defaults, this only works if > the user also ensures that matches the ABI of the relevant system libraries > that the compiler is using (e.g., because the user is explicitly linking with > a suitable libc). Right. That's what I was trying to figure out. Are we relying on the users of this option not to shoot themselves in the foot? It sounds like yes. I believe that's the way we handled it in icc also, but gcc and icc do a lot of sketchy things that we wouldn't want to do in clang. In this case I don't object to the sketchiness, just so everyone realizes that's what we're doing. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64067/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64067 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
