rnk added a comment. In D61742#1519539 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61742#1519539>, @russell.gallop wrote:
> > I was going to suggest that maybe what we should do is just embed the > > basename, i.e. /nodefaultlib:clang_rt.profile-x86_64.lib ... > > Do you mean /defaultlib:clang_rt.profile-x86_64.lib? > > > ... and then we just ask users to add one /libpath: flag to their linker > > invocation > > I'll try that. If it works, should we revisit the ubsan dependent lib > support, to be consistent? Yes, definitely. I'd like to do the same for asan, but things there are complicated by the various CRT linking modes. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61742/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61742 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
