aganea added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/R600ISelLowering.cpp:1717-1722 + // Fix spurious warning with gcc 7.3 -O3 for NewBldVec[i] below + // warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] +#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ >= 7 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 3 + if (i >= 4) + continue; +#endif ---------------- tstellar wrote: > We don't want to have ifdefs for specific compilers, can this be fixed > another way or dropped from the patch? Removed ifdefs, but I kept the test. This looks like an optimizer issue in GCC, however the regression tests are unaffected by this change. I will c-reduce and report it if it's still there in the latest GCC. ================ Comment at: llvm/trunk/unittests/Transforms/Scalar/CMakeLists.txt:14-17 +# Workaround for the gcc 6.1 bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80916. +if (CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX AND CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION VERSION_GREATER 6.0) + set_source_files_properties(LoopPassManagerTest.cpp PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-unused-function) +endif() ---------------- tstellar wrote: > Same thing here too. Not sure I understand, there're plenty of compiler-specific examples in the .cmake files. Is there an alternate way to fix this? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61046/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61046 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
