jdoerrie added a comment. In D60069#1449979 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069#1449979>, @mclow.lists wrote:
> I'm less enthusiastic about this change than the one for PR39871, because > there we were being inconsistent with ourselves. > However, my lack of enthusiasm is no reason not to land this. Thank you for accepting. I understand your point, but you could argue that this change fixes a inconsistency between `tuple_size` and `tuple_element`. As I don't think I have commit access, could one of you commit this change for me? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
