jdoerrie added a comment. In D60069#1449932 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069#1449932>, @mclow.lists wrote:
> In D60069#1449928 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069#1449928>, @mclow.lists > wrote: > > > Did you check the places that inherit from `tuple_element`? The > > public/private bits change between class and struct. > > > Never mind. I was thinking of something else; I don't think that anything > inherits from `tuple_element` Right, there shouldn't be any inheritance. Some of the `public:` access specifications are now redundant, though. Instead of template <size_t I, class... Types> struct tuple_element<I, tuple<Types...> > { public: typedef Ti type; }; we could now simply say template <size_t I, class... Types> struct tuple_element<I, tuple<Types...> > { typedef Ti type; }; Repository: rCXX libc++ CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60069 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
