yln added a comment. Seems as if we reached consensus! :) I will change the revision to use an intrinsic.
Before I start doing that, just one more quick idea: Would it work if UBsan directly inserts calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` (of course only when ASan is requested). Similar to how it inserts calls to it's own runtime functions (e.g., `__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable`). If we strive for the "simplest" solution... but maybe I am missing something in this is too simple? Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
