dgoldman added a comment. In D56924#1367450 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924#1367450>, @sammccall wrote:
> This is definitely an improvement, though I don't know if it's *right*. > @akyrtzi, thoughts? Yeah, I'm not sure what the desired behavior is. When writing up the test I noticed there is a `Obj::property`, presumably for the auto-generated getter method (which I then filtered out via `objcPropertyDecl`). Where is the qualified name used? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
