arphaman requested changes to this revision.
arphaman added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.

Do you know if this have an effect on the output of completion results or other 
tooling-based output?

A couple of requests:

- This behavior should be controlled by a printing policy flag 
`SupressUnwrittenScope` (specifically for the '::(class extension)').
- I also agree with Sam's comment. The property should still be qualified by 
the class name as well, e.g. `Obj::(class extension)::property`.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56924



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to