alexfh added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/MiscTidyModule.cpp:58
@@ -57,3 +56,1 @@
- CheckFactories.registerCheck<InefficientAlgorithmCheck>(
- "misc-inefficient-algorithm");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<MacroParenthesesCheck>(
----------------
alexfh wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > This will break projects that enable the misc-inefficient-algorithm check
> > (which clang 3.7 exposed). Is there a reason to not keep this check
> > registered under this name?
> >
> > (Perhaps a follow-up patch to allow deprecation of check names so that
> > users are given guidance would make sense.)
> I don't feel strongly, but I'm somewhat reluctant to keep old check names.
> With every new clang-tidy version someone starts using on a project, they
> need to carefully look at the list of checks and select relevant ones anyway.
> I think, adding facilities for deprecating checks and keeping old names is
> not going to help much, but will certainly add support burden for us.
But we certainly need to mention the rename in the release notes for 3.8.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16248
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
