On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Following Louis' suggestion, how about __pack_nth? > Maybe just __pack_element, to mirror its intended use to implement things like tuple_element? (I'm not completely happy about using this general name for something that only works for packs of types, but given that this template produces a type, it's probably the best we can do.) > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Nathan Wilson via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Nathan Wilson <nwilso...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> nwilson added a comment. >>>> >>>> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15421#326144, @rsmith wrote: >>>> >>>> > Bikeshedding on the name a bit... how about `__type_pack_element`? >>>> >>>> Hmm, I kind of felt like having `nth` in there implied we're indexing >>>> into something... What about `__nth_pack_element`? >>> >>> >>> Conversely, std::nth_element doesn't do indexing, and std::tuple_element >>> does. >>> >> >> Yeah, I was trying to combine them, but maybe that's misleading. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
