probinson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296#1283691, @grimar wrote:
> Nice :)
> So seems the last unresolved question left is the naming of the new option?
> If we do not want to go with `-gsingle-file-split-dwarf` then what it should
> be?
>
> What about `-fdebug-fission` as an alias for `-gsplit-dwarf`.
> And `-fsingle-file-debug-fission` for the new option?
>
> Or, may be:
>
> `-fdebug-fission` for the new option and then
> `-fdebug-fission -fdebug-split-dwo` would work together as `-gsplit-dwarf`?
Only DWARF supports this, correct? So I would suggest:
`-fdwarf-fission[={split,single}]` where the parameter defaults to `split`. Is
there any particular value in having two separate options?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
