echristo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296#1285328, @grimar wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296#1284130, @probinson wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296#1283691, @grimar wrote: > > > > > Nice :) > > > So seems the last unresolved question left is the naming of the new > > > option? > > > If we do not want to go with `-gsingle-file-split-dwarf` then what it > > > should be? > > > > > > What about `-fdebug-fission` as an alias for `-gsplit-dwarf`. > > > And `-fsingle-file-debug-fission` for the new option? > > > > > > Or, may be: > > > > > > `-fdebug-fission` for the new option and then > > > `-fdebug-fission -fdebug-split-dwo` would work together as > > > `-gsplit-dwarf`? > > > > > > Only DWARF supports this, correct? > > > I am not aware of any kind of debug information splitting except DWARF > splitting. > > > So I would suggest: `-fdwarf-fission[={split,single}]` where the parameter > > defaults to `split`. Is there any particular value in having two separate > > options? > > Probably not. `-fdwarf-fission[={split,single}]` sounds good for me. Still not sure I understand the point, but this option and the alias sounds good to me. Thanks. -eric https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
