astrelni added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/abseil-upgrade-duration-conversions.cpp:142
+
+template <typename T> void templateForOpsSpecialization(T) {}
+template <>
----------------
JonasToth wrote:
> astrelni wrote:
> > JonasToth wrote:
> > > what about non-type template parameters? Do they need consideration for
> > > the check as well?
> > > If i am not mistaken floats are allowed in newwer standards as well.
> > IIUC non-type template parameters should be no different for this check.
> > This particular case is to make sure explicit specializations are treated
> > differently from instantiations and get fix-it hints.
> Please test in that case that the behaviour is as expected.
Added some cases. I hope I interpreted correctly that "in that case" meant for
template specializations / instantiations for non type template parameters.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53830
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
