JonasToth added a comment.

No concerns except the small nits from my side.



================
Comment at: clang-tidy/abseil/NoInternalDepsCheck.cpp:24
+
+  // TODO(hugoeg): refactor matcher to be configurable or just match on any 
internal access from outside the enclosing namespace.
+  
----------------
Nit: This comment is very long, pls break the line


================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/abseil-no-internal-deps.rst:6
+
+Gives a warning if code using Abseil depends on internal details. If something 
is in a namespace or filename/path that includes the word “internal”, code is 
not allowed to depend upon it beaucse it’s an implementation detail. They 
cannot friend it, include it, you mention it or refer to it in any way. Doing 
so violtaes Abseil's compatibility guidelines and may result in breakage.
+
----------------
s/violtaes/violates/


================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/abseil-no-internal-deps.rst:8
+
+The folowing cases will result in warnings:
+
----------------
s/folowing/following/


https://reviews.llvm.org/D50542



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to