ilya-biryukov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49794#1182296, @yvvan wrote:
> Clang tidy is not only a standalone tool but also a plugin. It's almost never > used this way (but we do that in Qt Creator to combine it with Clazy) and it > also seems that some of the recent checks are added only to standalone tool > (which is easy to fix). > Being loaded into clang as plugin it does not support most of clang-tidy > command line options and is not able to filter system includes. I'm not sure > it's possible to fix both of these issues (and probably some other). Oh, I see, thanks for the pointers. Not related to this discussion, it seems reasonable to allow all the same options to be passed into clang-tidy plugin, not sure if that's easy or hard in principle to fix it. The added option seems like a workaround for a bug in clang-tidy and a windows locking bug (which is blocker for tools like clangd and libclang-based integrations, IMO). I would still vouch for fixing the bugs than adding flags that try to workaround those bugs. https://reviews.llvm.org/D49794 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
