> On Oct 16, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Adrian Prantl <apra...@apple.com > <mailto:apra...@apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk >> <mailto:rich...@metafoo.co.uk>> wrote: >> >> Ack, there are non-modular headers in the Darwin module. =( I seem to recall >> that they're not version-locked to your compiler, so we've got to support >> them as-is? >> >> If we can't turn on local submodule visibility, then we need a module map >> for libc++ that covers all of its headers. I'll look into pruning the >> include path when building a module from an implicitly-loaded module map. > > The attached patch implements this in the most hacky way; with it I can > successfully compile the first few hundred files of LLVM. > > Slightly less hacky approach attached, does this also unstick you? > <no-undeclared-includes.diff>
Unfortunately, no. After looking at it in the debugger, I believe the problem is that HeaderSearch looks at RequestingModule->NoUndeclaredIncludes, but the RequestingModule is a nullptr (while looking for cdefs.h included via assert.h, for example). — adrian
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
