On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Adrian Prantl <apra...@apple.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Ack, there are non-modular headers in the Darwin module. =( I seem to > recall that they're not version-locked to your compiler, so we've got to > support them as-is? > > If we can't turn on local submodule visibility, then we need a module map > for libc++ that covers all of its headers. I'll look into pruning the > include path when building a module from an implicitly-loaded module map. > > > The attached patch implements this in the most hacky way; with it I can > successfully compile the first few hundred files of LLVM. > Great, it looks like this plan should work then. What failure do you eventually hit? Does it look related to these <foo.h> changes? I'm working on a more refined version of the approach I described earlier; I'll mail you a patch to test when I have it finished.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
