On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 07:51:39PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:33 PM Noah Misch via cfarm-users > <cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:19:36PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > We have the (dis)pleasure of maintaining CMake source files. If it is > > > not too much trouble could someone install Cmake on GCC119. > > > > When I needed cmake on gcc119, I installed a private copy of > > cmake-3.12.0-rc2 as > > follows: > > > > ./bootstrap --prefix=$HOME/sw/cmake --parallel=10 --verbose CC=gcc > > CXX=g++ CFLAGS=-maix64 CXXFLAGS=-maix64 LDFLAGS=-Wl,-bbigtoc > > gmake -j10 > > gmake test > > gmake -j4 install > > > > (This doesn't fill your request, but I'm conveying these facts in case they > > help > > you or someone who does fill it.) > > > > > CMake is kind of fragile to begin with. I think it would be prudent to > > > test on AIX to see how things break and then fix the breaks. > > Why does cmake need to be compiled as 64 bit?
I don't have reason to suspect it needs that. I may have used it by reflex. > And linking with bigtoc > is a very inefficient, bad choice. If it really overflows the TOC, it > should be compiled with -mcmodel=large. Good to know. With no option, it did overflow the TOC. _______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
