On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:33 PM Noah Misch via cfarm-users <cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:19:36PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > wrote: > > We have the (dis)pleasure of maintaining CMake source files. If it is > > not too much trouble could someone install Cmake on GCC119. > > When I needed cmake on gcc119, I installed a private copy of cmake-3.12.0-rc2 > as > follows: > > ./bootstrap --prefix=$HOME/sw/cmake --parallel=10 --verbose CC=gcc CXX=g++ > CFLAGS=-maix64 CXXFLAGS=-maix64 LDFLAGS=-Wl,-bbigtoc > gmake -j10 > gmake test > gmake -j4 install > > (This doesn't fill your request, but I'm conveying these facts in case they > help > you or someone who does fill it.) > > > CMake is kind of fragile to begin with. I think it would be prudent to > > test on AIX to see how things break and then fix the breaks.
Why does cmake need to be compiled as 64 bit? And linking with bigtoc is a very inefficient, bad choice. If it really overflows the TOC, it should be compiled with -mcmodel=large. Because the Bull Freeware site does not maintain a consistent ABI, it's very difficult for me to install a cmake binary now. It would have been helpful to notify me of these additional software requirements during the last update of packages downloaded from Bull Freeware. - David _______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
