Hi Jonathan, Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 11:29, Jonathan Foulkes <j...@jonathanfoulkes.com> a écrit : > > Hi Seb, someone did just that and even better, compared two builds with the > dnsmasq being the only variable, and did not see any differences: > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/security-advisory-2021-01-19-1-dnsmasq-multiple-vulnerabilities/85903/85 > > From other comments, looks like they found the bug and are testing the fix. > https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/ldir.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a18346676850646764072ffcfd32ad9396d95c3 > > Jonathan > > > On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:40 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > Could you try to run top or htop and look at the CPU load? I could imagine > > that the fixes dnsmasq might have some CPU spikes that simply leave not > > enough cycles for the traffic shaper?
Is it possible you had a tab open on the Luci status page ? In my experience if you don't have uhttpd-mod-ubus (and maybe uhttpd-mod-lua) load average just keep climbing when you are looking at this page. https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=2613 Best Etienne _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
