> Op 18 aug. 2015 om 18:15 heeft Jan Schermer <j...@schermer.cz> het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
>> On 18 Aug 2015, at 17:57, Björn Lässig <b.laes...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/18/2015 04:32 PM, Jan Schermer wrote:
>>> Should ceph care about what scope the address is in? We don't specify it
>>> for ipv4 anyway, or is link-scope special in some way?
>>
>> fe80::/64 is on every ipv6 enabled interface ... thats different from legacy
>> ip.
>
> I'm not a network guru, but you can have same/overlapping subnets with IPv4
> as well
> that's why you have scopes, metrics, routing tables, policy routing tables
> etc.
> That's why I'm wondering what's different here.
>
It's IPv6, that's different. Search for link local, it will tell you what it is.
Wido
>>> And isn't this the correct syntax actually?
>>>
>>> cluster_network = fe80::/64%cephnet
>>
>> That is a very good question! I will look into it.
>>
>> Björn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
