> On 18 Aug 2015, at 17:57, Björn Lässig <b.laes...@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > On 08/18/2015 04:32 PM, Jan Schermer wrote: >> Should ceph care about what scope the address is in? We don't specify it for >> ipv4 anyway, or is link-scope special in some way? > > fe80::/64 is on every ipv6 enabled interface ... thats different from legacy > ip. >
I'm not a network guru, but you can have same/overlapping subnets with IPv4 as well that's why you have scopes, metrics, routing tables, policy routing tables etc. That's why I'm wondering what's different here. >> And isn't this the correct syntax actually? >> >> cluster_network = fe80::/64%cephnet > > That is a very good question! I will look into it. > > Björn > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
