> On 05/05/2015, at 18.52, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 5 May 2015, Tony Harris wrote: >> So with this, will even numbers then be LTS? Since 9.0.0 is following >> 0.94.x/Hammer, and every other release is normally LTS, I'm guessing 10.x.x, >> 12.x.x, etc. will be LTS... > > It looks that way now, although I can't promise the pattern will hold! I read it like major version is the release ie. Infernails, Jewel etc. following the letter position in the alfabet, I = 9th. letter, so we see all numbers 10,11,12,13…25 minor numbers = 2 will denote LTS eg. <major release>.2.<patch level>
/Steffen _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
