On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 7:08 AM Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote:
>
> This is also the case with us for Cephfs clients. We use the kernel mount,
> but still you need to install ceph-common. Which isn't possible with the
> latest version of Reef and thus those are stuck on 18.2.4.
> Or am I doing something wrong?
The version of ceph-common on the client side is much less relevant,
especially if you are using the kernel client. I wouldn't expect any
issues with upgrading the cluster while leaving ceph-common on the
client side as is. Technically, it's possible to mount the kernel
client without ceph-common being installed at all.
Thanks,
Ilya
>
> > Op 03-06-2025 06:03 CEST schreef Dmitry Melekhov <d...@belkam.com>:
> >
> >
> > 03.06.2025 00:30, Albert Shih пишет:
> > > Le 02/06/2025 à 15:59:00+0400, Dmitry Melekhov a écrit
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> 02.06.2025 15:39, Michel Jouvin пишет:
> > >>> I don't think it is useful to report that you have the problem...
> > >>> Everybody trying to deploy the RPMs on RHEL or any of its derivative
> > >>> will have the issue until 9.6 is released...
> > >> 9.6 is released some time ago:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> cat /etc/redhat-release
> > >> AlmaLinux release 9.6 (Sage Margay)
> > > I just like to understand what are the advantage to deploy directly on the
> > > OS and not through docker/podman container ? Is it just the history ?
> >
> > This server is client to cluster .
> >
> >
> > > Because as I understand with container you will have no issue isn't it ?
> > >
> > No, you are wrong, 17.2.9 has no container build.
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
