Hi Albert,
You are right. It has been discussed in other threads. Except if you have a
specific constraint, cephadm and conta-based deployment is the recommended
approach IMO and in this case you'll avoid this kind of problems.
Michel
Sent from my mobile
Le 2 juin 2025 22:32:31 Albert Shih <albert.s...@obspm.fr> a écrit :
Le 02/06/2025 à 15:59:00+0400, Dmitry Melekhov a écrit
Hi,
02.06.2025 15:39, Michel Jouvin пишет:
> I don't think it is useful to report that you have the problem...
> Everybody trying to deploy the RPMs on RHEL or any of its derivative
> will have the issue until 9.6 is released...
9.6 is released some time ago:
cat /etc/redhat-release
AlmaLinux release 9.6 (Sage Margay)
I just like to understand what are the advantage to deploy directly on the
OS and not through docker/podman container ? Is it just the history ?
Because as I understand with container you will have no issue isn't it ?
Regards
--
Albert SHIH 🦫 🐸
France
Heure locale/Local time:
lun. 02 juin 2025 22:27:29 CEST
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
