Ok, thanks for the clarification. Is there some log that I can check to see the progress of the "pg repair"?
Also, do you have any clues on what can cause the "extra object situation"? On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 4:51 PM Wesley Dillingham <w...@wesdillingham.com> wrote: > I have seen the issue. > > In my experience, running "ceph pg repair <pg>" fixes the issue, but one > must wait for the repair to commence and finish. So dont expect it to fix > it immediately; the repair needs to be scheduled and processed. > > Respectfully, > > *Wes Dillingham* > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> > w...@wesdillingham.com > > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:46 PM Work Ceph <work.ceph.user.mail...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the prompt response! >> >> I think that I did not understand. So, you have seen the issue I >> mentioned? Or, the issue of "ceph pg repair" not working properly? >> >> If you have seen the issue I mentioned, how did you overcome it? >> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 4:43 PM Wesley Dillingham <w...@wesdillingham.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, seen it, issuing a "ceph pg repair <pg>" has never not fixed it >>> post repair. >>> >>> Respectfully, >>> >>> *Wes Dillingham* >>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> >>> w...@wesdillingham.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:40 PM Work Ceph < >>> work.ceph.user.mail...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello guys, >>>> >>>> We are facing an unexpected error with a single PG after a node >>>> addition. >>>> >>>> We are seeing the following error message: >>>> ``` >>>> scrub : stat mismatch, got 299586/299585 objects, 0/0 clones, >>>> 299586/299585 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 pinned, 0/0 hit_set_archive, 0/0 >>>> whiteouts, 366757864470/366755158108 bytes, 0/0 manifest objects, 0/0 >>>> hit_set_archive bytes. >>>> log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] scrub 1 error >>>> ``` >>>> >>>> It looks as if there is an extra object in the PG. Have you guys ever >>>> seen >>>> such a situation? >>>> >>>> >>>> The command "rados list-inconsistent-snapset" does not return anything. >>>> The >>>> command "rados list-inconsistent-pg" only returns the affected PG. >>>> The command "rados list-inconsistent-obj" does not return anything. >>>> >>>> We are suspecting that this might be caused by the number of PGs in the >>>> pool, which is too small. However, before trying to increase it, we are >>>> trying to understand what is going on. >>>> >>>> Is it safe to increase the number of PGs with a PG inconsistent with >>>> this >>>> situation with an extra object? >>>> >>>> We are running Ceph on Ubuntu 22. We are using the standard Ceph >>>> binaries >>>> from the distro. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
