Yes, seen it, issuing a "ceph pg repair <pg>" has never not fixed it post repair.
Respectfully, *Wes Dillingham* LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> w...@wesdillingham.com On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:40 PM Work Ceph <work.ceph.user.mail...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys, > > We are facing an unexpected error with a single PG after a node addition. > > We are seeing the following error message: > ``` > scrub : stat mismatch, got 299586/299585 objects, 0/0 clones, > 299586/299585 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 pinned, 0/0 hit_set_archive, 0/0 > whiteouts, 366757864470/366755158108 bytes, 0/0 manifest objects, 0/0 > hit_set_archive bytes. > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] scrub 1 error > ``` > > It looks as if there is an extra object in the PG. Have you guys ever seen > such a situation? > > > The command "rados list-inconsistent-snapset" does not return anything. The > command "rados list-inconsistent-pg" only returns the affected PG. > The command "rados list-inconsistent-obj" does not return anything. > > We are suspecting that this might be caused by the number of PGs in the > pool, which is too small. However, before trying to increase it, we are > trying to understand what is going on. > > Is it safe to increase the number of PGs with a PG inconsistent with this > situation with an extra object? > > We are running Ceph on Ubuntu 22. We are using the standard Ceph binaries > from the distro. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
