A little late response, I had some time off. Thank you for updating the monitoring stack. I understand you can't always backport everything, but good to hear you're considering it!
> Op 29-04-2025 06:57 CEST schreef Nizamudeen A <n...@redhat.com>: > > > Good point, we are still on v2 of prometheus > (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/main/src/python-common/ceph/cephadm/images.py#L27) > (2.51.0) and I see v3 (https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/releases) is > there so a bump is needed there. We will take care of it along with the other > dependent ones. > > As for loki and promtail, we are moving away from promtail and going to use > alloy (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62960), since promtail is officially > deprecated by grafana. Once the migration is done we will bump loki and test > them together. > > I am not sure if we will backport the alloy thing to squid (could break > stuffs), but we can say more when we test it. > > And as for grafana it'll be 11.6.0 which is what we will use: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62827 > > Regards, > Nizam > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 8:37 PM Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote: > > This thread is only about Grafana, but what about the other services like > > Prometheus, Loki, Promtail, alertmanager or node-exporter? > > > > > Op 19-04-2025 15:18 CEST schreef Daniel Brown > > <daniel.h.brown@thermify.cloud>: > > > > > > > > > FWIW - Grafana 12 is going to be GA soon. 11.6 or later is probably > > where you want to target for “stable” releases for the moment. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dan Brown > > > > > > > On Apr 18, 2025, at 10:47, Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote: > > > > > > > > Really great you moved to the default grafana image and moving the > > customization to cephadm. This makes upgrading indeed easier. > > > > > > > > The problem is that Grafana has a stranger release cycle and therefor > > not really compatible with release cycle of Ceph. This would mean one or > > two update(s) of the supported Grafana minor version. And maybe with every > > Ceph release, update to the latest bugfix release? > > > > I guess a bugfix version should always work with the same minor > > version of Grafana. The user can configure this via the provided tools for > > setting custom images. > > > > > > > > We're only talking about Grafana, but this applicable for all the > > extra container images. > > > > > > > > Thank you for all the hard work you're doing for the project! These > > are just my 2 cents :D > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sake > > > >> Op 17-04-2025 19:43 CEST schreef Nizamudeen A <n...@redhat.com>: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> We deprecated [1] the use of quay.io/ceph/ (http://quay.io/ceph/) > > (http://quay.io/ceph/)ceph-grafana images from squid onwards due to the > > pain of building and maintaining those images by ourselves. The main reason > > > >> we were building a custom grafana image was to bundle the grafana > > dashboards and plugins inside the official grafana image. > > > >> > > > >> But with https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55615, we offloaded that > > to cephadm at runtime which removed the burden of building and maintaining > > it which is why > > > >> we are using the quay.io/ceph/ (http://quay.io/ceph/) > > (http://quay.io/ceph/)grafanaimage and its simply a mirror from the docker > > registry. And we are upgrading the grafana to 11.x in tentacle which is in > > progress > > > >> by @Afreen Misbah here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62827. > > > >> > > > >> We have two options for reef since we are still supporting reef > > actively. > > > >> 1. we can try and see if backporting that PR is possible, last time I > > couldn't because of cephadm binary differences but I could look again > > > >> 2. Just tag and continue to build a newer ceph-grafana:10.4.x image > > in quay. Once the image is there anyone can just go ahead and use it by > > updating the container image config. > > > >> > > > >> Will check both of them next week after the holidays. > > > >> > > > >> [1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/squid/#monitoring > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Nizam > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 7:43 PM Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote: > > > >>> Squid is already on 10.4.0 and it looks like it using the default > > grafana container images (correct?). > > > >>> > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/squid/src/cephadm/cephadmlib/constants.py > > > >>> > > > >>> I couldn't find any issues, but the company really doesn't like old > > software with know issues :) > > > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > > > > > -- > > Nizamudeen A > Sr. Software Engineer - IBM > Partner Engineer > > IBM and Red Hat Ceph Storage > Red Hat (https://www.redhat.com/) > > https://www.redhat.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io