This thread is only about Grafana, but what about the other services like Prometheus, Loki, Promtail, alertmanager or node-exporter?
> Op 19-04-2025 15:18 CEST schreef Daniel Brown <daniel.h.brown@thermify.cloud>: > > > FWIW - Grafana 12 is going to be GA soon. 11.6 or later is probably where you > want to target for “stable” releases for the moment. > > > -- > Dan Brown > > > On Apr 18, 2025, at 10:47, Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote: > > > > Really great you moved to the default grafana image and moving the > > customization to cephadm. This makes upgrading indeed easier. > > > > The problem is that Grafana has a stranger release cycle and therefor not > > really compatible with release cycle of Ceph. This would mean one or two > > update(s) of the supported Grafana minor version. And maybe with every Ceph > > release, update to the latest bugfix release? > > I guess a bugfix version should always work with the same minor version of > > Grafana. The user can configure this via the provided tools for setting > > custom images. > > > > We're only talking about Grafana, but this applicable for all the extra > > container images. > > > > Thank you for all the hard work you're doing for the project! These are > > just my 2 cents :D > > > > Kind regards, > > Sake > >> Op 17-04-2025 19:43 CEST schreef Nizamudeen A <n...@redhat.com>: > >> > >> > >> We deprecated [1] the use of quay.io/ceph/ > >> (http://quay.io/ceph/)ceph-grafana images from squid onwards due to the > >> pain of building and maintaining those images by ourselves. The main reason > >> we were building a custom grafana image was to bundle the grafana > >> dashboards and plugins inside the official grafana image. > >> > >> But with https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55615, we offloaded that to > >> cephadm at runtime which removed the burden of building and maintaining it > >> which is why > >> we are using the quay.io/ceph/ (http://quay.io/ceph/)grafanaimage and its > >> simply a mirror from the docker registry. And we are upgrading the grafana > >> to 11.x in tentacle which is in progress > >> by @Afreen Misbah here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62827. > >> > >> We have two options for reef since we are still supporting reef actively. > >> 1. we can try and see if backporting that PR is possible, last time I > >> couldn't because of cephadm binary differences but I could look again > >> 2. Just tag and continue to build a newer ceph-grafana:10.4.x image in > >> quay. Once the image is there anyone can just go ahead and use it by > >> updating the container image config. > >> > >> Will check both of them next week after the holidays. > >> > >> [1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/squid/#monitoring > >> > >> Regards, > >> Nizam > >> > >> > >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 7:43 PM Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote: > >>> Squid is already on 10.4.0 and it looks like it using the default grafana > >>> container images (correct?). > >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/squid/src/cephadm/cephadmlib/constants.py > >>> > >>> I couldn't find any issues, but the company really doesn't like old > >>> software with know issues :) > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
