> MDS (if you’re going to CephFS vs using S3 object storage or RBD block) Hi Anthony,
Can you elaborate on this remark? Should one choose between using CephFS vs S3 Storage (as it pertains to best practices)? On Proxmox, I am. using both CephFS and RBD. Regards, [image] Anthony Fecarotta Founder & President [image] anth...@linehaul.ai <mailto:anth...@linehaul.ai> [image] 224-339-1182 [image] (855) 625-0300 [image] 1 Mid America Plz Flr 3 Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 [image] www.linehaul.ai <http://www.linehaul.ai/> [image] <http://www.linehaul.ai/> [image] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthony-fec/> On Sun Apr 13, 2025, 04:28 PM GMT, Anthony D'Atri <mailto:anthony.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 13, 2025, at 12:00 PM, Brendon Baumgartner <bren...@netcal.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 11, 2025, at 10:13, gagan tiwari <gagan.tiw...@mathisys-india.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Anthony, >>> We will be using Samsung SSD 870 QVO 8TB disks on >>> all OSD servers. >> >> I’m a newbie to ceph and I have a 4 node cluster and it doesn’t have a lot >> of users so downtime is easily scheduled for tinkering. I started with >> consumer SSDs (SATA/NVMEs) because they were free and lying around. >> Performance was bad. Then just the NVMEs, still bad. Then enterprise SSDs, >> still bad (relative to DAS anyway). > > Real enteprise SSDs? Enterprise NVMe not enterprise SATA? Sellers can lie > sometimes. Also be sure to update firmware to the latest, that can make a > substantial difference. > > Other factors include: > > * Enough hosts and OSDs. Three hosts with one OSD each aren’t going to > deliver a great experience > * At least 6GB of available physmem per NVMe OSD > * How you measure - a 1K QD1 fsync workload is going to be more demanding > than a buffered 64K QD32 workload. >> >> Each step on the journey to enterprise SSDs made things faster. The problem >> with the consumer stuff is the latency. Enterprise SSDs are 0-2ms. Consumer >> SSDs are 15-300ms. As you can see, the latency difference is significant. > > Some client SSDs are “DRAMless”, they don’t use ~~ 1GB of onboard RAM per 1TB > of capacity as the LBA indirection table. This can be a substantial issue for > enterprise workloads. > >> >> So from my experience, I would say ceph is very slow in general compared to >> DAS. You need all the help you can get. >> >> If you want to use the consumer stuff, I would recommend to make a slow tier >> (2nd pool with a different policy). Or I suppose just expect it to be slow >> in general. I still have my consumer drives installed, just configured as a >> 2nd tier which is unused right now because we have an old JBOD for 2nd tier >> that is much faster. > > How much drives in each? >> >> Good luck! >> >> _BB >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
