I think the best course of action would be to open a tracker ticket with details about your environment and your observations, then the devs could try to see if something was overlooked with this change.
-- dan On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 5:48 PM Manuel Lausch <manuel.lau...@1und1.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > I thought the "fail" needs to propagated as well. Am I false? > > Who can have a look if a markdown message in "fast shutdown" mode is a > possibilitiy? I do not have the expertice to say if this would breakt > something else. But if this is possible I would vote for this. > > > Thanks > Manuel > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:02:30 +0200 > Dan van der Ster <d...@vanderster.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I suppose the idea is that it's quicker to fail via the connection > > refused setting than by waiting for an osdmap to be propagated across > > the cluster. > > > > It looks simple enough in OSD.cc to also send the down message to the > > mon even with fast shutdown enabled. But I don't have any clue if that > > would cause other issues. > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
