Karanbir Singh wrote: > ok, so you chased down Lutz's machine, broke into it > and were able to > verify his yum configs are changed or did you pull that one > out of thin > air.
> I do suspect something is not right, since the 4.7 updates > took as long > as they did to get to his machine. They have been 'out > there' for a fair > few weeks now. And the concern that live updates within the > distro broke > a production machine is very much there. > >From the notes on the "bug" you would have to have 4.5/os/$basearch/ instead of $releasever/os/$basearch/ to get the "bug". Also yum update or upgrade should not break anything unless you have packages from elsewhere and murked about with the configs. I have looked on the last month's list and not seen :- - people whose machines took weeks to autoupdate. - people whose production machines were broken by 4.6 to 4.7 Clearly Lutz's situation is unique and he has not told us the whole story. Regards, Vandaman. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
