On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 17:44 -0700, Russell Miller wrote: > I really wish I was joking or being facetious. I'm not. This is pretty much > the logical > end result of the abomination that's systemd, and the appallingly stupid idea > of putting > dbus into the kernel. There's a reason for privilege and process separation, > and people > seem to have forgotten it. > > More facetiously, Poettering will have rejoined a BSD project after > effectively having > killed off Linux for any production use, and laughing all the way to the > bank. :)
That is a fundamental worry. Everything, except the kernel, dependent on Poettering's (employed by Red Hat) windows-style gigantic systemd. Nothing can run without systemd's prior consent. One tiny bug in systemd and everything crashes. Is that RH's new "resilience" strategy? Have I really got this wrong? Remember the old fashioned sayings? *** Keep it simple stupid (KISS) *** If it ain't broke, don't fix it (= If it is not broken, do not attempt to repair it) M$-style script kiddies are improving Linux? Poettering-kraft ? Nein danke. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
