On Jul 8, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
> ]
> Ah, we will be at Centos 11 by then :)
> 
> Systemd will be a thing of the past and we will be dealing with systemq.

It'll be named "kitchensink", there will be only one process in the process 
table, and
every bit of computation will be handled using kernel threads.  All services 
will have
been moved into the kernel for "speed", and exceptions will be handled by 
everything being
virtualized - when the kernel crashes, the guest will just kill itself and 
respawn.

I really wish I was joking or being facetious.  I'm not.  This is pretty much 
the logical
end result of the abomination that's systemd, and the appallingly stupid idea 
of putting
dbus into the kernel.  There's a reason for privilege and process separation, 
and people 
seem to have forgotten it.

More facetiously, Poettering will have rejoined a BSD project after effectively 
having
killed off Linux for any production use, and laughing all the way to the bank. 
:)

--Russell
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to