On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 16:14 +0100, Michael Seibt wrote:
> did you succeed compiling CeGCC or another toolchain for WinCE/SH4 or
> even MIPS? How long did it take you?
> Or did you stop because you
> - couldn't invest as much time or
> - ran into severe problems/bugs?
I never tried SH4 or MIPS, because I don't have a reason to do so. My
PDA is ARM based.
The port from ARM to x86 was pretty painless except for an error of my
own that took a long time to find.
But of course x86 is very well supported in gcc. For x86, most of the
real work was configurating the build system.
If SH4 or MIPS are less stable in gcc or binutils, then more issues
might arise.
Most optimistic case : two man-days of work.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
