> Many thanks for your reply, Vincent. Unfortunately I have no experience > in building gcc cross-compilers (including cegcc), so I need to ask > another question. > > Is it really as easy as substituting "sh4" for "arm" in the places > implied by your diff? > Or will it be a much bigger job than that (as that doesn't seem like 3-4 > days effort!). > > And when you say 3-4 days, is that 3-4 days for a gcc guru, or 3-4 days > for someone who needs to find out a lot more about how these toolchains > work (like me!) ? > > And a final question: what do you think the likelihood of final success is? > Is this something that can definitely be made to work, or is it > something where there will be some final unsurmountable "gotchas" which > mean that it could never be made to work (at least without a huge effort > - e.g. like the problems on list reported for Windows Mobile 6.1 DLLs). > > Thanks again, > > Hywel.
Hi, For someone with no experience in gcc/autoconf/automake ... it can take more that 3-4 days ;-) And maybe one month could be a better estimation in your situation. I could not say if there will be gotchas, unfortunately the only way to know is to try. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
