On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:35 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:18 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >> in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED
> >> (like _fsize_t is guarded by _FSIZE_T_DEFINED) ?
> >>
> >> Vincent Torri
> >
> > I guess so. Mingw doesn't appear to have this though. Does this bother
> > you or is it a cosmetic question ?
>
> It bother me a bit. It is for the compilation of Lua for Windows CE (Yes
> it is possible !!). Indeed, the guy wrote some code to allow the
> compilation of Lua on that OS, and used _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED around the
> structure. Hence double definition of the structure when compiling.
>
> Even it is not a problem for Lua on win32, I'll report that to the MinGW
> devs.
I'll fix it.
I see that you've reported it to MinGW too - very good !
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
